T. Rowe Price

High-End Investor Platform

A web and mobile investor platform designed to make complex financial data easier to understand through clearer dashboards, insight cards, drill-down models, visualizations, and decision-support tools.

T. Rowe Price high-end investor platform interface screenshot

Client / Program

T. Rowe Price

Role

Sr. UX/UI Consultant

Product

Web / Mobile

Industry

Financial Services / Fintech

Scale

5-person cross-functional team

Overview

T. Rowe Price faced a challenge common in high-end investment experiences: users needed access to deep financial information, but dense data and complex interfaces could make it difficult to identify the right insights quickly.

As Sr. UX/UI Consultant, Jorge supported the design of a web and mobile investor platform focused on clearer data visualization, more intuitive drill-down patterns, bite-sized insight cards, and decision-support tools.

T. Rowe Price needed to help high-end investors navigate and interpret large volumes of complex financial data. The objective was to create a clearer, more usable web and mobile platform that could surface meaningful insights, support decision-making, and balance simplified data presentation with the analytical depth sophisticated investors require.

The real problem

High-end investors often need to navigate large volumes of complex financial data to make informed investment decisions.

The strategic challenge was creating clarity and usability within dense, technical information while preserving the depth necessary for analysis.

The experience needed to help users move from high-level portfolio insights to detailed analytics without feeling overwhelmed.

The core design problem was balancing simplicity and depth: reducing cognitive load while still supporting sophisticated financial decision-making.

Role and leadership

As Sr. UX/UI Consultant, Jorge worked with a cross-functional team that included data analysts, designers, and software engineers.

His responsibilities included UX strategy, interaction design, visual design, stakeholder collaboration, ideation facilitation, and translating user needs into actionable design requirements.

The role required aligning investment user needs with business goals while helping shape interaction models for data-rich financial experiences.

The work involved a 5-person cross-functional team. Collaboration was primarily on-site, supporting close coordination between data analysts, designers, engineers, and stakeholders throughout research, prototyping, testing, and refinement.

Methodology

The work followed a research-led, structure-first design process with continuous validation. The approach emphasized research over opinion, structure before surface, and continuous usability validation.

Frame - Align and define

Discover - Research and empathize

Structure - Information architecture

Ideate - Explore concepts

Interact - Optimize flows

Design - Visual and systems

Validate - Test and reduce risk

Launch - Build and QA

Improve - Measure and learn

Key deliverables

  • Bite-sized insight cards with cross-indexing
  • Intuitive data drill-down models
  • Mobile-first investment dashboards
  • Complex data visualization patterns
  • Responsive platform design
  • Portfolio exposure visualization
  • Interactive financial charts and graphs
  • Decision-support tools

Design process

Research and discovery

The research approach combined qualitative and quantitative methods.

The team conducted in-depth interviews with high-end investors to understand pain points, behavior patterns, and expectations around financial data access.

Surveys and broader insight gathering helped identify the need for concise data summaries, robust filtering, and drill-down capabilities.

Users expressed a preference for visual representations that could help them move quickly from summary-level information to deeper analysis.

Information architecture

The information architecture strategy focused on creating a user-centered framework that prioritized accessibility, intuitive navigation, and progressive disclosure.

The team structured content around investor needs, defined clearer paths for data exploration, and created hierarchical models that allowed users to drill down from high-level insights to detailed analytics.

This structure gave users more control over the complexity of information while preserving analytical depth.

Prototyping and testing

The team used an iterative prototyping process, starting with low-fidelity wireframes and progressing to high-fidelity interactive prototypes.

Usability testing sessions with representative users helped evaluate functionality, clarity, and ease of use.

Feedback from testing informed refinements before implementation, grounding the design in observed user behavior.

Iterations and refinements

The design process went through multiple iterations based on user testing feedback.

Users highlighted the need for more interactive elements, clearer visual representations, and stronger decision-support tools.

These insights led to refinements in data visualization, dashboard hierarchy, insight-card behavior, and drill-down interactions.

Technologies and methods

Axure RPSketchInVisionWireframingInteractive prototypingUsability testingData visualizationResponsive web and mobile design

Outcomes

The design work supported T. Rowe Price's goals around improving investor clarity, strengthening cross-device access, and making complex financial data easier to interpret.

By focusing on digestible visualizations, insight cards, drill-down models, and decision-support patterns, the platform helped investors move through complex information with greater confidence and control.

  • Supported more informed investment decision-making
  • Made complex financial data easier to scan and interpret
  • Improved clarity around portfolio exposure and risk information
  • Reduced friction in moving from high-level insights to detailed analytics
  • Strengthened cross-device access through responsive design
  • Supported a more guided investor analysis experience

Reflection

What worked well

  • Bite-sized insight cards communicated critical data points quickly and clearly.
  • A mobile-first approach supported a seamless experience across devices.
  • Interactive charts and graphs improved engagement with complex financial data.

Areas for improvement

  • Future versions could explore more advanced personalization for investor insights.
  • Additional performance optimization would further improve responsiveness for data-heavy views.

Key takeaways

  • Combining qualitative insight with quantitative data creates a more complete understanding of investor needs.
  • Continuous user feedback is essential when designing complex financial platforms.
  • Strong financial UX requires balancing simplicity with analytical depth.

Why this matters

Investor platforms must help users move from dense financial information to clear, trustworthy insight without stripping away analytical depth. Strong financial UX gives users a path from summary to detail while keeping complex data understandable and actionable.

Related Thinking

Why measuring outcomes - not outputs - changes execution Designing systems that evolve through change Return to all case studies